Till startsida
Sitemap
To content Read more abput how we use cookies on gu.se

Methodological notes

The report series LORE methodological notes was started in 2014 to complement the LORE working papers. The methodological notes are intended to be quick and very brief reports that serves to document the various methodological tests and evaluations that LORE conducts.

Recruitment to the Migration Attitudes panel. Recruitment rates and demographic differences

LORE methodological note 2017:2Author: Per Eisele

 

Incentivizing the SOM-surveys: Estimating the effects on questionnaire response rates

LORE methodological note 2017:1Authors: Sofia Arkhede, Henrik Oscarsson and Frida Vernersdotter

 

The effect of delayed first survey invitation to a newly recruited panel

LORE methodological note 2016:3Author: Johan Martinsson

 

The effect of including survey evaluation rating questions on subsequent open ended comments

LORE methodological note 2016:2Authors: Johan Martinsson and Elias Markstedt

 

Survey evaluations and coding of open-ended comments

LORE methodological note 2016:1Authors: Elias Markstedt and Johan Martinsson

 

Who comments surveys?
LORE methodological note 2015:8

Authors: Elias Markstedt and Johan Martinsson

 

Effects of additional reminders on survey participation and attrition

LORE methodological note 2015:7

Authors: Johan Martinsson and Maria Andreasson

 

Survey reminder timing – the effect of time between contact attempts

LORE methodological note 2015:6

Authors: Elias Markstedt and Johan Martinsson

 

Do gender, status and personalization of survey sender's signature affect response rates and evaluations of survey?

LORE methodological note 2015:5

Author: Maria Andreasson

 

Does explicit instruction to answer quickly speed up respondents in web surveys?

LORE methodological note 2015:4

Authors: Benedek Kurdi and Levente Littvay

 

Effects of giving examples in questions about global epidemics

LORE methodological note 2015:3

Author: Jonas Hägglund

 

Are incentives more efficient when recruiting to a panel or when inviting to a survey?

LORE methodological note 2015:2

Authors: Johan Martinsson and Karolina Riedel

 

Attitude stability in a self-recruited web-panel across ten panel waves

LORE methodological note 2015:1Authors: Johan Martinsson and Marcus Samanni


Day of the week for survey dispatch: effects on participation rates

LORE methodological note 2014:20

Author: Maria Andreasson

 

Offering an incentive in web panel recruitment. Most efficiently introduced at a later stage?
LORE methodological note 2014:19

Authors: Johan Martinsson and Karolina Riedel

 

When during the day do respondents want their e-mail survey invitation?
LORE methodological note 2014:18

Authors: Elias Markstedt and Johan Martinsson

 

When to send e-mail survey invitations during the day
LORE methodological note 2014:17

Author: Elias Markstedt

 

Topical survey invitations and issue opinions
LORE methodological note 2014:16

Author: Karolina Riedel

 

Altruistic or egoistic framing, and placement of recruitment questions in on-line surveys
LORE methodological note 2014:15

Authors: Johan Martinsson and Karolina Riedel

 

Personalization and incentives. Who can be convinced to join a web panel?
LORE methodological note 2014:14

Authors: Johan Martinsson and Karolina Riedel

 

Does mentioning recruitment source in invitation emails affect participation and completion rates?
LORE methodological note 2014:13

Author: Maria Andreasson

 

Device used to answer web surveys – data quality
LORE methodological note 2014:12

Authors: Elias Markstedt and Johan Martinsson

 

Device used to answer web surveys – demographics and stability LORE methodological note 2014:11

Author: Elias Markstedt

 

The long-term development of cumulative response rates in a probability based web panel

LORE methodological note 2014:10

Authors: Johan Martinsson and Karolina Riedel

 

Demographic and geographic differences in recruitment rates to a probability based web panel

LORE methodological note 2014:9

Author: Karolina Riedel

 

Recruitment effects of reminders, personalization and incentives

LORE methodological note 2014:8

Authors: Johan Martinsson and Karolina Riedel

 

Recruitment rates in different geographic areas and using different recruitment topics

LORE methodological note 2014:7

Author: Karolina Riedel

 

Auto-coding versus manual coding of most important problem

LORE methodological note 2014:6

Author: Elias Markstedt  

 

The effect of reminders – second case

LORE methodological note 2014:5

Author: Elias Markstedt

 

Effects of Progress Bars in Web Surveys

LORE methodological note 2014:4

Author: Maria Andreasson

 

The effect of reminders – first case

LORE methodological note 2014:3

Author: Elias Markstedt

 

Panel recruitment in the beginning or end of a survey

LORE methodological note 2014:2

Author: Elias Markstedt  

 

Afternoon and morning dispatch effects on participation rates

LORE methodological note 2014:1

Author: Elias Markstedt

 

Page Manager: Daniel Jansson|Last update: 2/24/2017
Share:

The University of Gothenburg uses cookies to provide you with the best possible user experience. By continuing on this website, you approve of our use of cookies.  What are cookies?

Denna text är utskriven från följande webbsida:
http://lore.gu.se/research/methodological-notes/
Utskriftsdatum: 2017-06-28